pvtltd.co

Audit compliance

Appointment of First/Subsequent Auditor - ADT-1 Filing

The auditor appointment process starts with the company approval trail and ends with ADT-1, the notice filed with the Registrar to keep the audit record aligned with the Companies Act.

Starting from INR 3,900Typical timelineAuditor appointment notice filing

Auditor appointment is one of the quiet but critical compliance jobs for an Indian company. The company has to pick the right auditor, approve the appointment through the correct company process, and then notify the Registrar using ADT-1 so the statutory record reflects the actual audit appointment. We help map whether the appointment is the first auditor or a subsequent auditor, check the relevant resolution and timing, and prepare the filing so the company does not miss the notice window.

What is included
  • First auditor or subsequent auditor review
  • ADT-1 filing preparation
  • Resolution and meeting date mapping
  • Company and auditor detail review
  • Deadline tracking for the notice
  • ROC follow-up if the filing is queried
Documents required
  • Auditor name and registration details
  • Board or member resolution details
  • Meeting date and appointment date
  • Company master data and signatory details
  • Auditor consent and eligibility evidence
  • Any prior auditor history if applicable
Government fees

See the fee table below for the statutory filing charge and common delay logic.

Legal basis
  • Companies Act, 2013 section 139
  • Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 rule 4(2)
  • ADT-1 notice of appointment of auditor by the company

Process

How the service works

The workflow is built to be predictable: document collection, legal review, filing, and post-filing follow-through.

Step 1Classification

Confirm whether this is a first or subsequent appointment

The legal timing and approval path differ for the first auditor and for a later appointment at AGM. We classify the appointment first so the filing logic matches the actual event.

Step 2Approvals

Prepare the board or member approval record

We verify the meeting date, the appointment date, and the auditor details so the resolution trail and the filing record stay aligned.

Step 3Filing

File ADT-1 within the proper window

Once the appointment is made, ADT-1 should be filed on time so the ROC record captures the notice without creating an avoidable delay fee issue.

Step 4Recordkeeping

Preserve the auditor record for the annual cycle

The appointment should remain visible in the company record so the annual compliance package can use the same details for the next cycle.

AEO summary

Appointment of auditor in India is governed by section 139 of the Companies Act, 2013 and is reported to the ROC through ADT-1 after the company makes the appointment, whether it is the first auditor or a subsequent auditor at AGM.

Why the auditor appointment is a statutory event

The auditor is part of the company's statutory control structure, not just a vendor. The appointment must be made under the Companies Act framework, and the company must keep the notice record current so the Registrar can rely on the same data the company is using internally.

This matters more for private limited companies that are scaling quickly. As soon as the company has larger revenue, more shareholders, or a funding event, the audit record becomes a diligence item. A clean appointment history keeps that review simple.

The filing also has a timing dimension. If the notice is late, the form can still be filed, but the company may face extra fee and unnecessary admin. A well-run process makes sure the appointment and the notice stay on schedule.

  • The auditor appointment is a statutory record, not a side note.
  • Timing matters because late filing can trigger extra fee.
  • The appointment details should match the company record exactly.

Section 139 and the ADT-1 route

Section 139 is the core provision governing auditor appointment. Rule 4(2) of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 requires the notice of appointment to be given to the Registrar in Form ADT-1.

In practice, the filing should include the meeting date, the appointment date, the auditor or audit firm details, and the company details that identify the appointment. The form should reflect whether the auditor is an individual or a firm and whether the appointment is at the first stage or later.

If the company falls into one of the classes that require a more structured appointment process, the internal approval trail should be preserved carefully because the ROC record is only one part of the statutory chain.

  • ADT-1 is the notice form.
  • Section 139 is the governing provision.
  • The company should keep the approval and meeting record in sync.

What companies should avoid

The most common mistake is leaving the filing until the deadline is almost over. That often leads to avoidable late fee and a rushed signature trail.

Another mistake is using the wrong appointment date or failing to reconcile the company resolution with the auditor record. If those pieces do not match, the filing may be queried or the internal records may become difficult to defend later.

A third mistake is forgetting that the appointment has to be carried into the annual compliance calendar. The auditor record should not live in one form alone; it should be part of the company's year-round record set.

  • Do not delay the notice.
  • Do not mismatch the appointment date and resolution date.
  • Do not treat ADT-1 as a one-off admin task.

Government fees

Fee breakdown

ItemFeeNotes
ADT-1 filing feeAs per MCA fee tableThe fee follows the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014.
Delay feeAs per delay slabLate filing may trigger additional fee according to the applicable delay table.
Professional certificationIncluded in service feeThe company still needs the proper signatory and professional certification path where required.

Timeline

Typical turnaround

Typical timeline usually means a 1 to 3 business days turnaround, assuming documents are complete and any board or shareholder approvals are already in place.

Pricing note

The filing fee follows the applicable MCA table. For delay-sensitive notices, the additional fee logic depends on the number of days after the statutory deadline.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is ADT-1 used for?
ADT-1 is the notice to the Registrar that a company has appointed an auditor. It is the statutory record of the appointment under the Companies Act and the related rules.
Does the first auditor also need ADT-1?
The filing treatment depends on the appointment route, but in practice the company should still keep the statutory notice record clean and aligned with the actual appointment event.
When should the filing be done?
The notice should be filed within the statutory time window after the appointment. Delays can lead to additional fee, so the company should not leave it until the end of the compliance cycle.
Why does the auditor notice matter if the audit is already underway?
Because the statutory record has to match the real appointment. If the appointment is not reflected properly, the company can run into problems in diligence, filing review, or compliance checks.

Canonical reference: https://pvtltd.co/services/appointment-of-auditor

Get started

Ready to move this filing forward?

We can help with the filing, the legal mapping, and the follow-up work that keeps the company compliant after submission.